Pages

Monday, December 30, 2013

How to Quickly Identify which Ancestors Need Temple Work Done

Do you already have tons of ancestors listed on your pedigree chart on familysearch.org? Would you like to do temple work for some of your ancestors but you feel lost in knowing where to start? If so, this blog post is for you.
I, like many members of the LDS church, have a lot of extended relatives who have already done TONS of family history work and temple work for my ancestors. In some wards family history committees ask ward members to complete a 4 generation pedigree chart and ensure all of those individuals have received their ordinance work. This is such a worthy cause, but in my case thousands of my distant relatives are members of the church working on the same ancestors' family history and ordinance work. My challenge is not the 4 generation chart, but rather figuring out where to begin after that.
Identifying an ancestor who needs their ordinance work completed and then doing it for them has been a goal of mine for years. This year my stake made it a goal with a deadline being stake conference. This carried with it some sense of group accountability that encouraged and helped me to follow through.
Determining to follow through on the goal I sat down at the computer. I logged into familysearch.org and began to click "back" on my family tree. I wanted to do this in an organized way so I wouldn't look at the same records multiple times. So, I went directly down my matriarchal line until it came to a "dead end" and then went down another line, looking for someone who has enough info and just needed their temple ordinance work done for them. (This might sound lazy, but it was at least a place to start.)

I kept clicking back... and back... and back... and back.... After looking and clicking for over an hour down one of thousands of potential family lines, I arrived at the year "0" without finding a "temple-ready" name. Although it was really cool to see their names and some titles like "sir" "queen" "bishop" "king" and even "Charlemagne Emperor of the West," (pictures of some of the coolest ones are at the end of this post) I felt like I hadn't helped anyone and that I wasn't any closer to accomplishing the goal.

After an hour of this interesting but not beneficial clicking I had had enough. Those who know me well, know that I really dislike totally tedious work. I like to be efficient as well as effective. Oftentimes that means using automated systems to eliminate monotonous, purposeless work. Being effective is way more important than being efficient, but if we can be effective efficiently then why not be? That's where Pandora's Hope Chest comes into play.

A few days after the hour-long family-history "click fest" a friend recommended Pandora's Hope Chest - a Google Chrome extension that syncs with familysearch.org to eliminate the busy-work of clicking around to search for temple-ready names.

HOW IT WORKS
Pandora searches through each ancestor on your chart and identifies who has enough information and simply needs their ordinance work done. Those "temple-ready" individuals' names can then be found by clicking on the "hope chest" at the stop of the screen. 

HOW TO INSTALL IT
1. Open the Google Chrome browser
2. Go to this website
3. Install the extension
4. Login to FamilySearch.org
5. Click on the green play arrow 
6. Sit back and relax as it searches through each name. (If there are thousands of names on your chart this could take many, many hours.)
7. Click on the "Hope Chest" and viola, there you will see the names of your ancestors whose information is complete enough to have ordinance work done in their behalf. 

IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER

1. Make sure it is not a duplicate: Some of my ancestors, like William Brewster, are listed 100+ times. In an ordinance worker training meeting years ago, a trainer mentioned that it took 17 hours of work to complete one individual's temple work. I imagine that was factoring in both the proxy's time as well as the time of every ordinance worker, laundry worker, recommend desk attendee, etc who may have been involved. Doing family history in a collaborative, organized and non-duplicated way as best as we can is challenging but important.
2. Reserve & Print it: If there are specific names you are hoping to do and that you are going to do relatively soon, reserve them. If you are not going to do them soon, possibly consider leaving them unreserved so a distant relative of yours may go ahead and help their work progress. 

2 years after making the goal I finally took ancestors names to the temple. 
HUGE THANKS TO 1) Whoever developed this extension! 2) Stake leaders for setting great goals 3) My friend Jason for telling me about this awesome extension

Here's to maximizing our potential influence by being effective... efficiently, ;)
Ali
_____________________________

Below are pics of some of the names that stood out to me while clicking "back" on my family tree.
Charlemagne, Emperor of the West
Hey Gramps ;) My mom couldn't believe he was listed on our tree as an ancestor. 
Family line of Charlemagne
King of Cologne - That's cool ;)

Another killer name

A Duke, A Prince & a Bishop
Coolness factor: way high
Interesting... very interesting.
This was the line that went further back than any others I could find.
Augis was born around the year 100. He is listed with his dad Hulmul and his grandpa Gapt. Whoa.


6 comments:

  1. Hi Allie,

    hope this comment thread is working. 2nd time is the charm.
    Troy & I were having issues w/ Pandora. Not sure if we are following the instructions properly. Here is our quandry:
    Hi Allie,

    its troy and Raymond.

    We have a question about Pandora. We made a video of our quandry:

    http://screencast.com/t/trnjQMS04WNe

    PS> Troy says to contact him for a copy of Snagit. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi uncle Ray & cuz Troy :)
      Here is a Snagit video of how to run Pandora. http://screencast.com/t/69hRgXiA I think the only thing you need to change is the view. Instead of viewing it in "Fan Chart" layout, go for "Traditional" and see if it works. Let me know if that works for ya!

      Delete
  2. This tool is not a 3rd Party program certified with FamilySearch. If it becomes certified, it will need to meet the requirements and program restrictions from FamilySearch. Until that time, use with caution.

    It also does not remind folks to follow the First Presidency's policy on submitting names for temple ordinances, found on fs.org, Get help, entitled Research and provide accurate information when submitting names for temple ordinances. This document reads:

    "Because of the sacred nature of this work, members should be diligent in assuring the accuracy of all information submitted for ordinance work." (16 June 1995, signed by First Presidency, Ensign, Sept. 1995, p. 80)

    Validating information involves documenting and presenting the information used when submitting a name for ordinances. Submitting many names without research is not adhering to the counsel from the brethren. Please research and accurately identify ancestors before submitting names for temple ordinances.

    Pandora fails to urge members to adhere to this policy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is an excellent reminder. Thanks Cathy.

      Yes, while Pandora is an excellent tool for identifying people in your line who haven't had work done yet, it does not check accuracy at all, or whether or not an individual is a duplicate. That is the next step I do after using Pandora.

      Ensuring that information is accurate and verifying possible duplicates are both really important steps. I like how the quote above counsels us to be "diligent" about the accuracy specifically. Thanks Cathy!

      Delete
  3. Mark and Meg, Thank you for your comment and the links you shared!

    I wrote this quite a while back, long before I had ever heard of Puzilla. I am SO glad that Puzilla is now available too! I agree completely with the thoughts, and concerns you expressed. As I used Pandora more, I saw very clearly that most of the individuals listed were in fact, duplicates. Just as you said, it's one's personal responsibility to do their best to ensure that temple work done is not duplicated work. I can't emphasize that enough. Like I mentioned in the post, it can take about 17 hours of work to do all of the ordinance work for 1 individual. The time and, more importantly, the sacredness of the work need it to be done as accurately as we possibly can.

    I also really appreciated the statistics you shared in your post. If there are other tools or resources you'd recommend, I'm all ears! I have a huge appreciation for and respect for the developers and programmers who make incredible tools to aide in doing family history better than we've done it in the past. If there are any other resources you'd recommend checking out, please feel free to share!

    Thanks again!
    Ali

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've got a question. Mark and Meg quoted the First Presidency, "Those whose names are submitted for proxy temple ordinances should be related to the submitter” (First Presidency, February 2012)."

    So, does this mean if I know friends of my wife who similarly passed away and who may want the work done for them and whose families may consent to it that I probably shouldn't do it so that later family members that become LDS in the future can do the work for them?

    I've felt a small burden in wanting to these female friends of Jamie's done, but I'm wondering if maybe I shouldn't, based on the First Presidency's statement.

    ReplyDelete